AWS details design pattern to verify compliance across thousands of leases using Amazon Quick and a deterministic rules engine
The Adjudicated Query pattern pairs Amazon Quick’s chat interface with a bounded MCP server and a versioned rules engine to deliver provably complete and defensible compliance answers.
1 source · cross-referenced
- Amazon Quick’s chat interface is paired with a deterministic rules engine to ensure compliance answers are provably complete and defensible.
- The Adjudicated Query pattern translates natural-language compliance questions into fixed operations without altering scope or making determinations.
- A reference architecture and AWS CDK sample are provided to deploy the pattern for lease compliance and other high-stakes domains.
- The pattern addresses gaps in RAG and text-to-SQL approaches, which cannot guarantee completeness or defend against hallucinations.
AWS describes a design pattern called Adjudicated Query that pairs Amazon Quick, an AI-powered chat assistant, with a deterministic rules engine to address compliance challenges at scale. The pattern is designed to ensure two critical properties: provable completeness and defensibility. Provable completeness means that claims like 'we checked all 22,910 Texas leases' must be verifiably true, with no leases silently omitted. Defensibility requires that any compliance finding can be traced to the specific version of the rule applied, the clause text evaluated, the method used, the date of assessment, and the responsible party.
The post highlights the limitations of traditional approaches such as Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and text-to-SQL in meeting these requirements. RAG, while improving accessibility, cannot guarantee completeness because similarity search lacks a mechanism to ensure all relevant documents are included. Text-to-SQL, while narrowing the gap, risks hallucinated predicates that silently reduce the scope of evaluation, producing exact-looking numbers that are methodologically unsound.
The Adjudicated Query pattern solves these issues by introducing a bounded conversational layer over a deterministic rules engine. In this setup, the model’s role is strictly limited to translating natural-language compliance questions into calls on a fixed set of typed operations and narrating the results returned by the rules engine. The model does not write queries, alter the scope of evaluation, or perform determinations. The rules engine itself operates on versioned rules data, using generic comparison operators to evaluate lease clauses against current regulations.
The pattern is illustrated through a reference architecture and a deployable AWS CDK sample, with lease compliance serving as the primary use case. However, AWS notes that the pattern is applicable to other high-stakes compliance domains, including sanctions screening, insurance claims adjudication, and export control. The post provides a concrete example of a portfolio operator managing 50,000 leases across multiple states, where state-specific landlord-tenant laws frequently change, necessitating a scalable and verifiable compliance process.
- Oct 14, 2026 · TechCrunch — AI
Science Corporation implants vision-restoring PRIMA chip in first Stargardt disease patient
Trust78 - Oct 13, 2026 · TechCrunch — AI
Flox Intelligence raises $5M and launches edge AI devices to deter wildlife from critical infrastructure
Trust79 - Oct 13, 2026 · Hugging Face
Hugging Face releases LFM2.5-24B-A2B, a 24B-parameter reasoning agent with 2B active parameters for on-device use
Trust79