Skip to content
Safety · Sep 28, 2026

Researchers demonstrate faster RSA signature forgery via subexponential-time attack

A 2007-era cryptographic attack has been reimplemented to forge RSA signatures more efficiently than full factoring, but only against unpadded, raw signatures and 1024-bit keys.

Trust79
HypeLow hype

3 sources · cross-referenced

ShareXLinkedInEmail
TL;DR
  • The attack is a signature forgery method, not a private-key recovery technique.
  • It only applies to unpadded RSA signatures, not the padded schemes used in practice.
  • For 1024-bit RSA, forging a signature required 1,380 CPU core-years over five months.
  • The underlying research dates to 2007; the new element is an implementation update.

A previously known cryptographic attack against RSA has been reimplemented to forge digital signatures more efficiently than full factoring, according to a summary of the work posted on Schneier on Security. The attack is a forgery method rather than a private-key recovery technique, meaning it does not expose the private key directly.

The technique only works against pure RSA signatures—those without formatting or padding—conditions that are not typical in real-world deployments. Standard use of RSA relies on padding schemes such as PSS or PKCS#1 v1.5, which mitigate this class of attack.

The authors report that forging a signature on a 1024-bit RSA key required approximately 1,380 CPU core-years of computation, spread over about five real-world months. This is described as a subexponential-time algorithm that is somewhat faster than factoring for the same key size, but remains computationally intensive.

The foundational research dates to 2007, and the new element here is the implementation update rather than a fundamentally new cryptanalytic result. The authors maintain a webpage explaining the context and provide a link to the original paper.

Security practitioners commenting on the post emphasized that the practical risk today is limited because most systems do not use raw, unpadded RSA signatures. They nonetheless argue the result highlights the need for cryptographic agility and timely migration away from 1024-bit keys and outdated padding schemes.

Sources
  1. 01Schneier on Security — New Attack Against RSA
  2. 02Ars Technica — There’s a new way to break RSA that’s faster than anything we’ve seen before
  3. 03International Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR) ePrint — Cryptanalysis of RSA and Related Schemes
Also on Safety

Stories may contain errors. Dispatch is assembled with AI assistance and curated by human editors; despite the trust-score filter, mistakes happen. We correct publicly — every article links to its revision history. Nothing here is financial, legal, or medical advice. Verify before relying on any claim.

© 2026 Dispatch. No ads. No sponsorships. No paid placement. Reader-supported via Ko-fi.

Built by a person who cares about honest AI news.