Skip to content
Safety · Aug 13, 2026

Researchers demonstrate extraction of proprietary LLM reasoning traces via replay and jailbreak

A new paper shows how encrypted chain-of-thought blocks from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google could be decrypted and replayed across sessions and models, revealing internal reasoning previously considered inaccessible.

Trust79
HypeLow hype

1 source · cross-referenced

ShareXLinkedInEmail
TL;DR
  • Researchers recovered plaintext reasoning from encrypted chain-of-thought blocks returned by Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google models by replaying traces into weaker sibling models and applying jailbreak prompts.
  • The attack relied on shared encryption keys within model families, enabling decryption of reasoning traces from frontier models when fed into weaker variants.
  • Providers have since fixed the issue after receiving a coordinated disclosure; Claude Haiku 4.5 was the most vulnerable to the technique.
  • The work also highlights a prompt-injection variant where models treat their own reasoning traces as sacrosanct, increasing susceptibility to embedded instructions.

A new paper demonstrates how encrypted chain-of-thought blocks returned by Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google could be decrypted and replayed across sessions, users, and models, enabling recovery of a stronger model’s hidden reasoning in plaintext.

The authors found that models within the same family used identical encryption keys, allowing an attacker to take a reasoning trace produced by a frontier model, feed it into a weaker sibling, and extract the unencrypted reasoning through a jailbreak prompt.

Providers have since fixed the issue after receiving a coordinated disclosure; all model providers acknowledged receipt of the report and subsequently prevented the same attacks from being reproduced.

Claude Haiku 4.5 was the most vulnerable to the technique, which relied on a prompt instructing the model to transcribe reasoning within a specific XML-like tag and an assistant turn prefix feature that was later removed in version 4.6.

The paper includes examples of extracted reasoning traces, such as internal notes from GPT-5.5 about CSS architecture decisions, illustrating how these tokens were never intended for human consumption.

The authors also describe a prompt-injection variant in which a model is tricked into embedding data-exfiltration instructions within its reasoning trace; when that encrypted trace is replayed into another model, the receiving model treats the trace as sacrosanct and is more likely to follow the embedded instructions.

Sources
  1. 01Simon Willison — everythingStealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs
Also on Safety

Stories may contain errors. Dispatch is assembled with AI assistance and curated by human editors; despite the trust-score filter, mistakes happen. We correct publicly — every article links to its revision history. Nothing here is financial, legal, or medical advice. Verify before relying on any claim.

© 2026 Dispatch. No ads. No sponsorships. No paid placement. Reader-supported via Ko-fi.

Built by a person who cares about honest AI news.