Researchers demonstrate extraction of proprietary LLM reasoning traces via replay and jailbreak
A new paper shows how encrypted chain-of-thought blocks from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google could be decrypted and replayed across sessions and models, revealing internal reasoning previously considered inaccessible.
1 source · cross-referenced
- Researchers recovered plaintext reasoning from encrypted chain-of-thought blocks returned by Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google models by replaying traces into weaker sibling models and applying jailbreak prompts.
- The attack relied on shared encryption keys within model families, enabling decryption of reasoning traces from frontier models when fed into weaker variants.
- Providers have since fixed the issue after receiving a coordinated disclosure; Claude Haiku 4.5 was the most vulnerable to the technique.
- The work also highlights a prompt-injection variant where models treat their own reasoning traces as sacrosanct, increasing susceptibility to embedded instructions.
A new paper demonstrates how encrypted chain-of-thought blocks returned by Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google could be decrypted and replayed across sessions, users, and models, enabling recovery of a stronger model’s hidden reasoning in plaintext.
The authors found that models within the same family used identical encryption keys, allowing an attacker to take a reasoning trace produced by a frontier model, feed it into a weaker sibling, and extract the unencrypted reasoning through a jailbreak prompt.
Providers have since fixed the issue after receiving a coordinated disclosure; all model providers acknowledged receipt of the report and subsequently prevented the same attacks from being reproduced.
Claude Haiku 4.5 was the most vulnerable to the technique, which relied on a prompt instructing the model to transcribe reasoning within a specific XML-like tag and an assistant turn prefix feature that was later removed in version 4.6.
The paper includes examples of extracted reasoning traces, such as internal notes from GPT-5.5 about CSS architecture decisions, illustrating how these tokens were never intended for human consumption.
The authors also describe a prompt-injection variant in which a model is tricked into embedding data-exfiltration instructions within its reasoning trace; when that encrypted trace is replayed into another model, the receiving model treats the trace as sacrosanct and is more likely to follow the embedded instructions.
- Aug 13, 2026 · Ars Technica — Technology Lab
Credentials for thousands of organizations exposed in LiteLLM supply-chain attack
Trust79 - Aug 12, 2026 · Schneier on Security
Defensive prompt injections can neutralize AI hacking agents by triggering guardrails
Trust74 - Aug 12, 2026 · The Verge — AI
Researchers say AI-assisted exploit allowed takeover of Zoom devices with fewer than 20 prompts
Trust72