Israeli firm Cognyte markets mobile cell-site simulator for law enforcement use
Contract documents show FalcoNet devices can be mounted in vehicles, backpacks, or helicopters to force nearby phones to connect, raising privacy and oversight concerns.
2 sources · cross-referenced
- Cognyte, an Israeli surveillance company, sells a mobile cell-site simulator called FalcoNet to U.S. law enforcement, including a Texas agency.
- The technology mimics a cell tower, forcing nearby phones to connect and enabling surveillance of all devices in range, not just targets.
- FalcoNet can be concealed in vehicles, carried in backpacks, or attached to helicopters, according to contract documents.
- The devices operate similarly to the Stingray systems made by L3Harris, which have drawn prior scrutiny.
Cognyte, an Israeli surveillance company, has begun marketing a mobile cell-site simulator called FalcoNet to U.S. law enforcement agencies, including a contract with the state of Texas. The technology mimics a mobile phone tower, forcing nearby phones to connect to it, which allows authorities to monitor devices in the vicinity regardless of whether they belong to suspects.
According to contract documents reviewed by Forbes and cited by Schneier on Security, FalcoNet can be deployed in multiple form factors: concealed within vehicles, carried in backpacks for on-foot operations, or attached to helicopters. This versatility expands the potential use cases for cell-site simulators beyond fixed locations.
The underlying technology is comparable to the Stingray systems produced by L3Harris, which have previously drawn scrutiny for their use in law enforcement operations. Cell-site simulators operate by impersonating legitimate cell towers, tricking nearby devices into connecting and revealing their locations and other identifying data.
The Texas Department of Public Safety’s contract with Cognyte, referenced in reporting and linked materials, outlines use cases that include mapping local criminal networks and addressing challenges posed by terrorism or rogue state actors. However, the documents do not detail specific legal or procedural safeguards governing data collection or minimization.
Public interest groups have raised questions about oversight, transparency, and the potential for incidental collection of data from individuals not under investigation. Critics argue that the deployment of such tools without clear legal guardrails risks undermining public trust in policing and surveillance technologies.
- Jul 27, 2026 · The Verge — AI
Nvidia, Microsoft, and others form Open Secure AI Alliance to develop open-source AI security tools
Trust72 - Jul 27, 2026 · arXiv cs.CL
Paper proposes stylistic triggers to bypass multimodal model safety defenses
Trust79 - Jul 24, 2026 · Schneier on Security
Researchers propose a new metric to measure AI’s alignment with user intent
Trust76