Skip to content
Research · Aug 13, 2026

AI research agent achieves verifiable bound in Conway’s 99-graph problem

A systematic, reproducible attack by an autonomous agent establishes new constraints on the existence of a strongly regular graph with parameters srg(99,14,1,2), including a forced-structure reduction and a best verified artifact at 69.43%.

Trust79
HypeLow hype

1 source · cross-referenced

ShareXLinkedInEmail
TL;DR
  • An autonomous AI research agent produced a systematic, reproducible attack on Conway’s 99-graph problem under a partial-credit evaluation metric.

A new arXiv preprint reports that an autonomous AI research agent systematically attacked Conway’s 99-graph problem, a long-standing open question in combinatorics that asks whether a strongly regular graph with parameters srg(99,14,1,2) exists.

The agent’s verifiable contributions include an exhaustive proof that no circulant graph on Z/99 satisfies more than 3366/4950 (68.0%) of the constraints, with the same ceiling applying to the other abelian group of order 99.

The work introduces a forced-structure reduction showing that λ=1 implies each neighborhood is a perfect matching and μ=2 places outer vertices in bijection with non-matched neighbor pairs, reducing the existence question to a 12-regular graph on 84 vertices encoded for CP-SAT and validated by recovering the unique srg(9,4,1,2).

The paper also presents a validated prescribed-automorphism orbit-existence framework checked on srg(9,4,1,2) and the Paley graph srg(13,6,2,3), alongside a best verified artifact at 69.43% achieved by fourteen distinct methods, none of which exceeded this bound.

The results are entangled with the open problem because any provable bound below 4950 constitutes a non-existence proof for the target graph.

Sources
  1. 01arXiv cs.AIA Forced-Structure Reduction and Verifiable Bounds for Conway's 99-Graph
Also on Research

Stories may contain errors. Dispatch is assembled with AI assistance and curated by human editors; despite the trust-score filter, mistakes happen. We correct publicly — every article links to its revision history. Nothing here is financial, legal, or medical advice. Verify before relying on any claim.

© 2026 Dispatch. No ads. No sponsorships. No paid placement. Reader-supported via Ko-fi.

Built by a person who cares about honest AI news.