Skip to content
Research · Jul 15, 2026

Paper proposes stochastic control framework for zero-fee perpetual futures market making

The preprint introduces a unified model for adaptive bid-ask spreads, cross-exchange hedging, and Kelly-optimal leverage under CARA utility, with phase transitions between profitable and unprofitable regimes.

Trust79
HypeLow hype

1 source · cross-referenced

ShareXLinkedInEmail
TL;DR
  • A new arXiv preprint formalizes optimal market making in zero-fee perpetual futures as a stochastic optimal control problem on a filtered probability space.

A new arXiv preprint develops a theoretical framework for optimal market making in perpetual futures markets with zero maker fees, framing the market maker’s problem as a stochastic optimal control problem on a filtered probability space. The controls include adaptive bid-ask spreads and inventory hedging decisions executed across two exchanges.

The authors contribute a profit-and-loss decomposition theorem that separates revenue into spread income, adverse selection loss, inventory carrying cost, hedging friction, and funding rate exposure. They derive the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation for the joint spread–inventory–hedging control problem under constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) utility, including a verification theorem.

The paper introduces High-APY Regime Theorems that characterize profitable regions via five dimensionless parameters and culminates in a Master APY Formula. It also analyzes zero-fee economics on decentralized perpetual exchanges, including optimal entry–exit thresholds, and derives optimal cross-exchange hedging policies under funding rate dynamics.

Additional results include a robustness margin quantifying tolerance to parameter uncertainty, exponential drawdown probability bounds, a universal APY–VaR identity, and ergodic inventory distributions under optimal control with Bayesian adaptive estimation. The authors also derive Kelly-optimal leverage with ruin boundaries and multi-pair portfolio allocation with diversification saturation results.

Numerical analysis with twenty-three figures is reported to reveal phase transitions between profitable and unprofitable regimes. The framework unifies and extends prior paradigms by Avellaneda–Stoikov, Gueant–Lehalle–Fernandez–Tapia, and Glosten–Milgrom to modern decentralized venue microstructure.

Sources
  1. 01arXiv cs.AIOptimal Adaptive Market Making: A Theoretical Framework for High-Yield Liquidity Provision in Perpetual Futures Markets
Also on Research

Stories may contain errors. Dispatch is assembled with AI assistance and curated by human editors; despite the trust-score filter, mistakes happen. We correct publicly — every article links to its revision history. Nothing here is financial, legal, or medical advice. Verify before relying on any claim.

© 2026 Dispatch. No ads. No sponsorships. No paid placement. Reader-supported via Ko-fi.

Built by a person who cares about honest AI news.