Skip to content
Policy · Jul 3, 2026

Researcher challenges social media bans for teens, citing lack of causal evidence

Candice Odgers argues bans may push teens toward less regulated corners of the internet and calls for platform taxes to fund adult-facing services.

Trust74
HypeLow hype

1 source · single source

ShareXLinkedInEmail
TL;DR
  • Researcher Candice Odgers critiques Jonathan Haidt’s claims that social media harms teen mental health, citing longitudinal data.
  • Odgers argues social media use does not predict later depression in teens, while parental mental health and overdose deaths are stronger predictors.
  • She warns bans may push teens into less regulated online spaces and calls for taxing platforms to fund adult-facing services like counselors.
  • Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, France, the UK, Denmark, and Slovenia have enacted or prepared measures to limit children’s use of social platforms.

Candice Odgers, a developmental psychologist and associate dean for research at the University of California Irvine, has emerged as a prominent critic of claims that social media is a primary driver of declining teen mental health. In a TED talk posted in April 2026, Odgers argued that the prevailing narrative—exemplified by Jonathan Haidt’s *The Anxious Generation*—overstates social media’s causal role in teen mental health outcomes.

Odgers’ position is grounded in longitudinal research she has led since 2008, tracking thousands of 10-to-14-year-olds through phone data, school records, and sleep metrics. She reports that while depressed girls tend to use social media more, social media use does not predict later depression. Instead, she points to parental overdose deaths—more than doubling between 2011 and 2021—and caregivers’ mental health as stronger predictors of child outcomes.

She also challenges the assumption that banning teens from social platforms will improve their mental health, noting that no study has tested whether such bans yield measurable benefits. Odgers warns that bans could push teens toward less regulated corners of the internet and allow platforms to avoid accountability. Her alternative proposal is to tax social platforms and invest the proceeds in adult-facing services such as school counselors, drop-in centers, and digital mental health services.

Odgers’ critique arrives as multiple Western democracies move toward restricting children’s access to social media. Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, France, the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Slovenia have enacted or are preparing measures that typically bar users under 15 or 16 from platforms including TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and X. These moves reflect growing concern over child safety, mental health harms, and algorithmic influence, even as Odgers’ research suggests the causal link between social media and teen mental health remains unproven.

Sources
  1. 01Platformer — Casey NewtonWhy social media bans are gaining steam
Also on Policy

Stories may contain errors. Dispatch is assembled with AI assistance and curated by human editors; despite the trust-score filter, mistakes happen. We correct publicly — every article links to its revision history. Nothing here is financial, legal, or medical advice. Verify before relying on any claim.

© 2026 Dispatch. No ads. No sponsorships. No paid placement. Reader-supported via Ko-fi.

Built by a person who cares about honest AI news.