Skip to content
Evals · Oct 5, 2026

Turkish decision-making benchmark HakemBench released with 2,346 items across seven tracks

HakemBench evaluates models on Turkish decision-making tasks including fact-check triage, legal routing, and moderation, with open-source data and a scoring harness under CC BY 4.0.

Trust79
HypeLow hype

1 source · cross-referenced

ShareXLinkedInEmail
TL;DR
  • HakemBench is a new Turkish benchmark for evaluating models on typed decision-making tasks, released under CC BY 4.0.
  • The benchmark includes 2,346 items and 4,275 questions across seven tracks: fact-check triage, education, guardrails, legal routing, moderation, spam and phishing, and customer support.
  • A scoring harness evaluates decision quality, calibration, and selective automation, reporting composite scores and bootstrap intervals.
  • Gold labels were generated via blind passes of one AI model family compared to votes from a panel of LLMs, not human-verified.
  • The top composite score on the leaderboard is 0.888; the releasing lab’s model ranks 7th at 0.660.

HakemBench is a Turkish benchmark designed to evaluate models on typed decision-making tasks, where a model reads a text, a question, and a fixed set of options, then returns a probability for each option. The benchmark’s first release, version 1.0, is fully open under the CC BY 4.0 license and includes 2,346 items and 4,275 questions distributed across seven tracks: fact-check triage, education, guardrails, legal routing, moderation, spam and phishing, and customer support.

A scoring harness accompanies the benchmark to evaluate three metrics: decision quality (macro F1), calibration (via normalized Brier score), and selective automation (via normalized area under the generalized risk-coverage curve). These metrics are combined using a geometric mean, and the harness reports intervals derived from 2,000 bootstrap draws. Additional probes assess sensitivity to option order, paraphrase, English translation, and substituted names.

Gold labels for the benchmark were generated through blind passes of one AI model family, compared against the aggregated votes of a panel of large language models from other model families. The authors note that these labels are not human-verified.

The public leaderboard includes 16 entries, with the top composite score at 0.888. The releasing lab’s own model ranks 7th with a composite score of 0.660; however, the authors flag that this model’s training data was shaped by earlier runs’ test results, particularly affecting its performance in guardrail, moderation, and customer support tracks. When scored only on the other four tracks, the lab’s model achieves a composite score of 0.678, placing it 6th of 16.

Sources
  1. 01arXiv cs.CL — HakemBench: A Turkish Benchmark of Typed Decisions
Also on Evals

Stories may contain errors. Dispatch is assembled with AI assistance and curated by human editors; despite the trust-score filter, mistakes happen. We correct publicly — every article links to its revision history. Nothing here is financial, legal, or medical advice. Verify before relying on any claim.

© 2026 Dispatch. No ads. No sponsorships. No paid placement. Reader-supported via Ko-fi.

Built by a person who cares about honest AI news.