Apple introduces DeepAmbigQA dataset to test LLM answer completeness on ambiguous multi-hop questions
A new dataset and pipeline from Apple’s ML Research team evaluates how well LLMs handle questions with name ambiguity and multi-step reasoning, revealing gaps even in state-of-the-art models.
1 source · cross-referenced
- Apple’s ML Research team introduced DeepAmbigQA, a dataset of 3,600 questions designed to test LLMs on ambiguous multi-hop reasoning.
- Half of the questions in DeepAmbigQA explicitly require resolving name ambiguity, while all require multi-step evidence gathering.
- Experiments show even state-of-the-art models like GPT-5 produce incomplete answers, with exact match scores of 0.13 on ambiguous questions and 0.21 on non-ambiguous ones.
- The team also released DEEPAMBIGQAGEN, an automatic data generation pipeline that constructs QA tasks grounded in text corpora and linked knowledge graphs.
Apple’s Machine Learning Research team introduced DeepAmbigQA, a dataset of 3,600 questions designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on ambiguous multi-hop reasoning. The dataset is constructed using DEEPAMBIGQAGEN, an automatic data generation pipeline that creates QA tasks grounded in text corpora and linked knowledge graphs. This pipeline generates natural and verifiable questions that systematically embed name ambiguity and multi-step reasoning, two challenges that existing QA benchmarks rarely evaluate jointly.
Half of the questions in DeepAmbigQA explicitly require resolving name ambiguity—such as distinguishing between multiple films sharing the same title—while all questions demand multi-step evidence gathering and integration. For example, the dataset includes complex questions like “Which actor from the film Heat won at least one Academy Award?”, which requires identifying the correct film, retrieving the cast, and then filtering for actors with Academy Awards.
In experiments reported by the authors, even state-of-the-art models such as GPT-5 showed incomplete answers on the dataset. The models achieved an exact match score of 0.13 on ambiguous questions and 0.21 on non-ambiguous questions, indicating significant room for improvement in producing complete and accurate answer sets.
The release includes both the DeepAmbigQA dataset and the DEEPAMBIGQAGEN pipeline, enabling researchers to generate additional tasks and extend the benchmark. The authors emphasize that the findings highlight the need for more robust QA systems capable of handling information gathering and answer completeness, especially in open-domain settings where ambiguity and multi-step reasoning are common.
- Aug 1, 2026 · Simon Willison — everything
smevals framework released for small-scale model, prompt, and harness evaluation
Trust79 - Jul 27, 2026 · arXiv cs.CL
Paper proposes model-consensus framework to rank LLM responses without fixed ground truth
Trust79 - Jul 20, 2026 · Apple — Machine Learning Research
Apple releases LVSum, a benchmark for timestamp-aware long video summarization with 72 videos across 13 domains
Trust84