Prosecutors’ use of ChatGPT logs as evidence results in mistrial in Los Angeles arson case
A California arson trial featured ChatGPT logs as evidence, but jurors rejected the argument and delivered a hung jury, prompting a mistrial.
1 source · cross-referenced
- Prosecutors in a Los Angeles arson trial introduced ChatGPT logs as evidence against the defendant.
- Jurors rejected the ChatGPT logs as proof of intent or character, resulting in a 10-2 deadlock and a mistrial.
- One juror said ChatGPT use is common and does not indicate a character flaw.
Prosecutors in Los Angeles introduced ChatGPT logs as part of their case against Jonathan Rinderknecht, who was charged with setting a fire on New Year’s Day in 2025 that became one of the deadliest wildfires in Los Angeles history.
The logs included ChatGPT generating images of fire, a conversation in which Rinderknecht asked the chatbot, “Why am I so angry all the time?”, and a screen recording where he asked whether someone could be blamed for a fire started by a cigarette.
Jurors were unconvinced by the ChatGPT logs as evidence of intent or character, according to reporting by The Verge.
The jury deadlocked 10-2 in favor of the defense, leading the judge to declare a hung jury and a mistrial.
One juror told CBS LA that she did not believe the ChatGPT logs proved anything and that she personally uses ChatGPT regularly, adding that the prosecution’s reliance on the logs made her "angry."
- Jun 27, 2026 · The Verge — AI
Apple cites AI-driven component costs in price increases for MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and HomePod Mini
Trust72 - Jun 25, 2026 · The Verge — AI
Ford admits automated systems required rehiring 350 engineers to correct errors
Trust75 - Jun 25, 2026 · TechCrunch — AI
Engineering hiring resilient amid AI adoption, SignalFire data shows
Trust74