SF Compute CEO outlines vision for programmable data centers and liquid compute markets
SF Compute argues that independent compute markets require physical settlement, programmable infrastructure, and neutrality from dominant hardware vendors.
1 source · single source
- SF Compute’s market matches buyers and sellers of GPU compute while handling physical constraints like interruptibility, recovery time, and GPU generation.
SF Compute, a company trading GPU compute hours, describes its expansion from subleasing clusters to operating what it calls a programmable data center, handling physical settlement so buyers receive usable compute rather than cash against an index.
Evan Conrad, CEO of SF Compute, argues that independent markets require neutrality because companies with large hardware or inference businesses face incentives that make it harder to run a neutral exchange, contrasting with vertically integrated cloud providers.
The company matches orders with different constraints—such as interruptibility, recovery from storage, GPU generation, networking, and software configuration—reflecting physical realities that affect both contract terms and pricing.
Conrad positions SF Compute’s approach as analogous to software-defined networking, which separated control and data planes to virtualize routing, suggesting a similar architectural shift for GPUs and supercomputing.
SF Compute’s market supports spot and forward pricing and distinguishes between batch and live inference leases, aiming to reflect the actual cost of acquiring compute rather than relying on abstract indices.
The company highlights engineering challenges such as visiting sites, designing clusters, running the backplane, and making infrastructure programmable, including the ability to subdivide InfiniBand fabric on the fly.
- Oct 20, 2026 · Latent Space — swyx
DeepSeek, MiniMax, and Mercury release new agentic models with mixed benchmark results
Trust76 - Oct 19, 2026 · arXiv cs.AI
Researchers propose Structured Authority Injection to enforce persistent human control in LLM agent systems
Trust79 - Oct 16, 2026 · arXiv cs.AI
New benchmark and training method show real-time LLM agents struggle when environments evolve during inference
Trust84